Chapter 1: Our Riches. Chapter 2: Well-Being for All. Chapter 3: Anarchist Communism. Chapter 4: Expropriation. Chapter 5: Food. Chapter 6: Dwellings.
|Published (Last):||9 October 2019|
|PDF File Size:||1.64 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.60 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A combination of detailed historical analysis and far-reaching Utopian vision, this is a step-by-step guide to social revolution: the concrete means of achieving it, and. The essential difference consists in this, that the anarchists are far more concerned with dividing up than with the organization of production; and that they conceive of the organization of production as taking the form, not of a huge cooperative commonwealth, but of a great number of "free," small, self-governing communes.
It need hardly be said that such a social system would fail to liberate mankind from nature's yoke, for in it the forces of production would not be developed even to the degree to which they have been developed under capitalism.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. The Conquest of Bread by Pyotr Kropotkin.
Get A Copy. Paperback , pages. Published December 1st by AK Press first published More Details Original Title. Other Editions Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about The Conquest of Bread , please sign up. Be the first to ask a question about The Conquest of Bread. Lists with This Book.
Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 4. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Start your review of The Conquest of Bread. Anarchism: The name given to a principle or theory of life and conduct under which society is conceived without government — harmony in such a society being obtained, not by submission to law, or by obedience to any authority, but by free agreements concluded between the various groups, territorial and professional, freely constituted for the sake of production and consumption, as also for the satisfying of the infinite variety of needs and aspirations of a civilized being.
This is how Kropotkin Anarchism: The name given to a principle or theory of life and conduct under which society is conceived without government — harmony in such a society being obtained, not by submission to law, or by obedience to any authority, but by free agreements concluded between the various groups, territorial and professional, freely constituted for the sake of production and consumption, as also for the satisfying of the infinite variety of needs and aspirations of a civilized being.
This is how Kropotkin defined anarchism in , for the 11th edition of the Encyclopedia Britanica. Russian prince, geographer, and outstanding anarcho-Communist writer. Raised as Imperial Cadet, later a cavalry officer; studied mathematics and geography. In visited Switzerland and joined the anarchist International Workers Association. Imprisoned for agitation in Russia in Escaped from jail and moved through England, Switzerland, and France where he was imprisoned for five years.
Returned to Russia after the February Revolution. Adapted from glossary entry for Kropotkin in Victor Serge's Memoirs of a Revolutionary When I looked through several books I have that deal with anarchism directly or indirectly, I found The Conquest of Bread CoB mentioned more often than any of Kropotkin's other writings. As an example, in Colin Ward's book Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction he notes that the Mexican peasant revolutionary Emiliano Zapata was "made literate" by the anarchist Ricardo Flores Magon, through reading and discussing this book with him.
Before getting into the book, here's a list of some of Kropotkin's works, taken from Rudolf Rocker's bibliography in Anarcho-Syndicalism Theory and Practice.
Anarchist Communism: Its Basis and Principles 2. The Conquest of Bread 3. The State: Its Role in History 4. Fields, Factories, and Workshops 5. Memoirs of a Revolutionist 6. Modern Science and Anarchism 7. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution 8.
The Modern State 9. Ethics: Origin and Development Of these, all but 8 can be easily obtained even today, a century and more after Kropotkin wrote them. Here on Goodreads, Conquest of Bread has been rated by over readers; 7 by over ; 5 by about ; a couple not on the list by about All others are near , or fewer. Thus I would venture to say that the book here reviewed is Kropotkin's most widely read book, at least in the 21st century.
I Our Riches. V Food VI Dwellings VII Clothing - These three chapters lay out the reasons, methods, and justifications by which the common people may, on their own initiative and action, provide the essentials of food, dwellings, and clothing to all VIII Ways and Means - Why the current system will not and cannot supply for all IX The Need for Luxury - By no means will items of "luxury" be no longer available in an anarchist society.
There will be ample opportunity for workers to engage in production and distribution of such items for all who want them. X Agreeable Work - How it can come about, because of great increases in productivity in modern times, that no one will be forced to work as wage-slaves now do.
Women will benefit as they will no longer be forced to work only in the home, as even less than a wage-slave. XI Free Agreement - Arguments for, and examples of, the way in which free agreements among groups of people can effect the benefits which, some claim, can only be provided with a State which dictates.
The State is not needed. XII Objections - How the objections urged against an anarchist society can be met XIII The Collectivist Wages System - Why it must come to pass that people in an anarchist society no longer be subject to different wages, depending on the type of work they do.
Rather than a description of "facts", it should be a science : "The study of the needs of mankind, and the means of satisfying them with the least possible waste of human energy. Beyond that, each can choose to devote effort to what interests them, be it art, science, the production of luxuries, or nothing at all. XVI The Decentralization of Industry - The concentration of particular industries as the specialization of certain peoples, countries, areas, is unnecessary and counterproductive in the modern world.
XVII Agriculture - This chapter is a detailed accounting of the acreage and human hours required, using modern agricultural methods, to allow the three and one-half million citizens of the two departments Seine, Seine-et-Oise round Paris, with their 1,, acres, to produce all the corn and cereals, milk, cattle, vegetables and fruit that the population requires.
Chiefly interesting for the way that Kropotkin argues foe the self-sufficiency of such a population, and the amount of the land left over for houses, roads, parks, and forests. That is, "Communism" for Kropotkin is organization and living by the principles of the commune. Or, as Kropotkin himself says, it is "Communism without government — the Communism of the Free. It is the synthesis of the two ideals pursued by humanity throughout the ages — Economic and Political Liberty.
He was not particularly happy with what he observed, but was of an age that he felt precluded him from attempting to actively engage in what was going on. Here is a link to a first-hand account of a meeting that he had in with Lenin. Kropotkin contrasts this idea with that of "the Collectivists".
These are the followers of the other major anarchist theoretician of the second half of the nineteenth century, Mikail Bakunin , who is taken as the founder of "collectivist anarchism". The aspect of Bakunin's system that disturbs Kropotkin here is "that payment proportional to the hours of labor rendered by each would be an ideal arrangement… suffice it to say here, leaving ourselves free to return to the subject later [which he does, particularly in XIII The Collectivist Wages System], that the Collectivist ideal appears to us untenable in a society which considers the instruments of labor as a common inheritance.
Starting from this principle, such a society would find itself forced from the very outset to abandon all forms of wages. This is an idea that Kropotkin brings up again and again. Introduced in chapter I Our Riches, he returns to it in chapter III: In the present state of industry, when everything is interdependent, when each branch of production is knit up with all the rest, the attempt to claim an Individualist origin for the products of industry is absolutely untenable.
The astonishing perfection attained by the textile or mining industries in civilized countries is due to the simultaneous development of a thousand other industries, great and small, to the extension of the railroad system, to inter-oceanic navigation, to the manual skill of thousands of workers, to a certain standard of culture reached by the working class as a whole — to the labours, in short, of men in every corner of the globe. The Italians who died of cholera while making the Suez Canal, or of anchyloses in the St.
Gothard Tunnel, and the Americans who were mowed down by shot and shell while fighting for the abolition of slavery, have helped to develop the cotton industry of France and England, as well as the work-girls who languish in the factories of Manchester and Rouen, and the inventor who following the suggestion of some worker succeeds in improving the looms.
How, then, shall we estimate the share of each in the riches which ALL contribute to amass? The property, factories, machines, farmland, roads, railways, buildings, housing, which have been financed, developed, manufactured, built by the toil and efforts of countless workers, inventors — many compensated richly for their capital contributions, vast numbers of others, particularly those who actually did the work, expended the effort given a pittance even nothing by which they could barely sustain themselves and their families … all these things must be looked up as the common inheritance of those alive today, not as the property of the descendants of those who have already been compensated to an unjust extent.
No need for government Men do not need to be told by social or political higher ups how to live, how to solve problems that require more than simply personal attention — there are ample examples of free associations of men and groups of men that have made significant decisions on how an important enterprise can be organized, and this has always been done simply through discussion, bargaining, and coming to an agreement on what would in fact benefit everyone concerned to the best extent.
This idea is explored most fully in XI Free Agreement. Kropotkin tells how the European railway network came into being through free agreements between the scores of separate companies that had developed small pieces of the system, then connected them together, established routes and schedules, figured out how to allow freight to move over the entire network without having to unload and reload at company "boundaries" — all without the intervention of any Central authority or State Agency.
He goes through many other examples of things that have been organized by free agreement of people who simply saw a need for something to be done, and did it: the way that the Dutch settled questions of canal access; the similar way that shipowners settled question of boat access along the Rhine; the establishment of the British Lifeboat Association, manned and financed by volunteer seamen; and the founding, staffing, organization, and activities of the Red Cross.
On revolutionary failures the Paris Commune In this instance, which is discussed in both the Preface which Kropotkin wrote in , and in different chapters of the original book, the beginning of the end occurred when groups of the revolutionaries separated off to make decisions which they deemed needed to be made FOR THE PEOPLE. The "decision makers" begin to argue about what needs to be done, what rules and regulations need to be effected and put into place, and meanwhile … the people STARVE because their immediate daily NEEDS which are of course provided for the decision makers in their own privileged ways are completely disregarded.
And so goes another failed revolution. Particularly, with various contemporary movements such as the Transition movement , which emphasize localized aspects of society, more support for local businesses, local food production, CSAs Community Supported Agriculture , local banking, and so forth Much of what Kropotkin says may be extremely applicable in some future.
A book to be passed on into that future. Very highly recommended. View all 7 comments. Jun 27, E.
The conquest of bread - Peter Kropotkin
A combination of detailed historical analysis and far-reaching Utopian vision, this is a step-by-step guide to social revolution: the concrete means of achieving it, and. The essential difference consists in this, that the anarchists are far more concerned with dividing up than with the organization of production; and that they conceive of the organization of production as taking the form, not of a huge cooperative commonwealth, but of a great number of "free," small, self-governing communes. It need hardly be said that such a social system would fail to liberate mankind from nature's yoke, for in it the forces of production would not be developed even to the degree to which they have been developed under capitalism. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read.
The Conquest of Bread
Peter Kropotkin's "The Conquest of Bread", along with his "Fields Factories and Workshops" was the result of his extensive research into industrial and agricultural production; originally published by G. Putnam's Sons, New York and London, Whereas Marx's main contribution to economics was his analysis of the commodity relationship in Capital - capitalism rather than communism - Kropotkin assesses what would need to be done, and most importantly how, in a communist society. Now, almost years later, technology and society has changed enormously, but the practical consideration Kropotkin gives to the question of production and distribution in a revolutionary society has taken on a new importance in the context of our globalised, interdependent, and resource intensive economic system. The country-wide rebellion that was kicked off by the police murder of George Floyd continues to grow, as across the US people hit the streets in solidarity. Mass demonstrations, freeway shut
Between and , it was serialized in part in the London journal Freedom , of which Kropotkin was a co-founder. In the work, Kropotkin points out what he considers to be the defects of the economic systems of feudalism and capitalism and why he believes they thrive on and maintain poverty and scarcity. He goes on to propose a more decentralized economic system based on mutual aid and voluntary cooperation, asserting that the tendencies for this kind of organization already exist, both in evolution and in human society. The Conquest of Bread has become a classic of political anarchist literature. It was heavily influential on both the Spanish Civil War and the Occupy movement.